I chose to watch a sit com on a network we don’t normally watch.
Without sound, I noticed a lot of body language and facial expressions. There
seemed to be some tension within a group of assumed friends, with eye rolling,
arm crossing and one friend stomping away at one point. As the show proceeded, the
characters came to a moment where they slowly warmed up, going from arms
crossed to a smirk then a smile and finally a hug.
In watching this program again with sound, I had assumed correctly
that these were friends having a conflict. Both girls liked the same boy and
were jealous of one another. They came to realize that he wasn’t as important
as maintaining their friendship.
I found that I felt familiar with this schema as my daughter
is a Disney Channel watcher and although this isn’t a network we typically
watch, the layout of the sitcom was much the same as other shows we regularly
see. Actors on a sit com are typically quite animated making it easier to “read”
their non-verbal body language. The progression of conflict to resolution is
common and thus easily recognizable.
My A-ha moment came when I realized I was depending on a
pre-conceived schema of pre-teen sit com content. I hope to be much more aware
of my dependence on assumptions; based on previous experiences. My assumptions
may be confirmed like in this sit com or I may find myself off-base, making it
difficult to be objective. Dependence on schemas can affect my ability to authentically
interact with others, which is essential for both personal and professional
relationships.



